![]() There truly is a minute difference here when stretched over a season, further providing reason for you to load up at other positions and take your second quarterback later in the draft - preferably a high-upside quarterback you believe in. QB25 and QB30 was the exact same differential. ![]() The difference between last year’s QB18 and QB24 was just 1.5 fantasy points per game. Late secondary quarterbacks (QB25 and later) can be had in the much later rounds of your draft and still give you nearly the same amount of fantasy points as those taken earlier. As previously noted in the graph above, the dropoff in significant contributors at the running back and wide receiver position is stark in contrast to quarterbacks. The luxury of drafting with this strategy allows you to wait quite a while for your second quarterback while hammering the key positions of running back and wide receiver. This strategy allows you to net one of the top quarterbacks without missing out on the top-end running backs and wide receivers. The Studs-n-duds method focuses on taking one quarterback early in your draft and waiting until much later to draft your second one. Double-dipping with two early quarterbacks may seem like a positional advantage, but the relative cost you’re giving up when foregoing a top-end running back or wide receiver doesn’t really make it worth it. ![]() There’s a much higher discrepancy in fantasy scoring between the RB6 and RB12 (3.1 PPG) compared to the QB6 and QB12 (1.3 PPG). You can see from the graph above that the dropoff in quarterbacks is far less steep when compared to top-tier running backs and wide receivers over the past three years. Sure, starting a lineup with Aaron Rodgers and Russell Wilson can give you peace of mind, but what’s the opportunity cost? Is it worth netting two high-end caliber quarterbacks and foregoing top-12 running backs and wide receivers? This style of drafting aggressively targets quarterbacks early in your draft, typically netting you two quarterbacks in your first three rounds. Like most things in fantasy football, there are several strategies in play that you can utilize to your advantage. How does that translate to a startup dynasty draft? Quarterbacks vault up the draft board and are no longer just an afterthought. Quarterbacks should be flexed in superflex leagues. While the table above is a bit of a crass generalization, you get the point I’m trying to convey. Quarterbacks generally far outscore other positions on a regular basis and I’d rather start Alex Smith over Isaiah Crowell any day of the week. PPR Fantasy Points per GameĬomparing quarterbacks who finished in fantasy scoring ranked 13th to 24th versus RB25-36, WR37-48, and TE13-24, we can see that there really is a seismic shift in fantasy points accrued. Simply put, if you’re playing in a superflex league, you should be rostering a quarterback in that spot. QB2s (QB13-QB24) often far outscore traditional flex points accrued from an RB3/WR4. ![]() It changes the whole dynamic of the draft, with quarterbacks surging in value. If you’re entering your first superflex league, you’ll soon find out that this type of format returns prominence to the quarterback position.įor those unfamiliar, superflex refers to an additional flex spot that allows you to use either a QB/RB/WR/TE in that slot. New dynasty leagues are being formed every day, and each league has its own set of unique rules and challenges for you to overcome as an owner. Following the NFL draft, we are officially in what I like to call startup season.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |